Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa1 | 885MPa21.67x stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa1 | 940MPa247% stronger |
| Elongation at break | 40%12.5x more ductile | 16%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa3 | 107–122GPa4 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³5 | 4,430kg/m³21.78x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg2.98x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg10% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.36 | 0.3422 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa1.67x stiffer in shear | 42.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa28% higher | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,084m/s5% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K72.45x more heat through a fin | 6.6W/m·K4 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K1 | 9µm/m·K41.75x less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 45µm growth1.75x less |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K7 | 580J/kg·K416% higher |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s1.6x faster | 2.57mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 3,730W/m1.8x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | melting range1,630–1,650°C2 |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 400°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources7 documents: EOS GmbH, TIMET, Steel Construction Institute, Cleveland-Cliffs
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 2TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Yield strength: typical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offsetTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, plate, annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Elongation at break: typical, in 2 in., plate annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Density: nominalTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Poisson's ratio: mean of TIMET measurementsTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Melting point: melting rangeTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Max service temperature: upper recommended use temperature
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical range, 20 °CTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Thermal conductivity: typical, 20 °C, mill annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Thermal expansion: typical, mean 0-100 °CTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Specific heat: typical, 20 °C
- 5EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 6Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 7316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (1.67x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter: 4,430 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 115 GPa for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 10% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 40% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.52x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.98x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.3x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 16% for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340