Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Steel AISI 1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa142% stronger | producer-stated372MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa145% stronger | producer-stated441MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | 40%12.67x more ductile | in 2 in15%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa3 | base material200GPa4 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³5 | base material7,861kg/m³4 |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg42% higher | 47.3kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25.4MN·m/kg9% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.36 | base material0.324 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | 75.7GPa6% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 185GPa20% higher |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,043m/s4% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Steel AISI 1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K7 | base material51.9W/m·K4 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K1 | base material12µm/m·K831% less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 60µm growth31% less |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K7 | base material486J/kg·K4 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 13.6mm²/s3.31x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 5,473W/m2.65x more resistant |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources8 documents: EOS GmbH, Niagara LaSalle, U.S. Department of Defense, Steel Construction Institute, Cleveland-Cliffs, Ovako
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- Steel AISI 1018
- AISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 21018 PropertiesNiagara LaSallearchived copySteel AISI 1018 · Yield strength: producer-stated, cold drawnSteel AISI 1018 · Ultimate tensile strength: producer-stated, cold drawnSteel AISI 1018 · Elongation at break: in 2 in (50.8 mm)
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4MIL-HDBK-5J, Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures (2003)U.S. Department of DefenseSteel AISI 1018 · Young's modulus (stiffness): base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Density: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Poisson's ratio: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Thermal conductivity: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Specific heat: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
- 5EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 6Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 7316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
- 8S275JR Steel GradeOvakoSteel AISI 1018 · Thermal expansion: base material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Steel AISI 1018?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 372 MPa for Steel AISI 1018 (42%).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 1018?
Steel AISI 1018 is lighter: 7,861 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 1018?
Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 185 GPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 1018?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Steel AISI 1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 9% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 42% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 26% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 19% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 1018?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 15% for Steel AISI 1018.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 1018?
Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 1018 vs. Steel
- Steel AISI 1018 vs. Steel A992
- Steel AISI 1018 vs. Stainless Steel 303
- Steel AISI 1018 vs. Stainless Steel 316