Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | mean861MPa1 | 885MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | mean886MPa1 | 940MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | mean at break19.9%124% more ductile | 16%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | base material197GPa3 | 107–122GPa4 |
| Density | mean part density7,790kg/m³1 | 4,430kg/m³21.76x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg1.81x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg2% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.2723 | 0.3422 |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa1.82x stiffer in shear | 42.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa19% higher | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 5,084m/s1% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material17.9W/m·K32.71x more heat through a fin | 6.6W/m·K4 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C10.4µm/m·K1 | 9µm/m·K416% less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth | 45µm growth16% less |
| Specific heat | base material460J/kg·K3 | 580J/kg·K426% higher |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s1.94x faster | 2.57mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m47% more resistant | 3,730W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | melting range1,630–1,650°C2 |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 400°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources4 documents: EOS GmbH, TIMET, Cleveland-Cliffs
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine Material Data Sheet, M 290EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Yield strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: mean at break, as built, horizontalDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Density: mean part density (ISO 3369)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)
- 2TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Yield strength: typical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offsetTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, plate, annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Elongation at break: typical, in 2 in., plate annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Density: nominalTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Poisson's ratio: mean of TIMET measurementsTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Melting point: melting rangeTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Max service temperature: upper recommended use temperature
- 317-4 PH Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
- 4TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical range, 20 °CTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Thermal conductivity: typical, 20 °C, mill annealedTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Thermal expansion: typical, mean 0-100 °CTitanium Ti-6Al-4V · Specific heat: typical, 20 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (3%).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter: 4,430 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 115 GPa for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 2% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 34% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 47% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.81x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.79x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.78x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 19.9% elongation at break against 16% for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 10.4 µm/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH