Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa1 | 1,275MPa22.41x stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa1 | 1,379MPa22.15x stronger |
| Elongation at break | 40%14.44x more ductile | 9%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa3 | H 900197GPa2 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³4 | H 9007,800kg/m³2 |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 163kN·m/kg2.44x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg8% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.35 | H 9000.2722 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | 77.4GPa9% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa7% higher | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,026m/s4% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K6 | at 149 °C17.9W/m·K2 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K1 | mean10.8µm/m·K246% less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 54µm growth46% less |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K6 | mean460J/kg·K2 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 4.99mm²/s22% faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 7,809W/m3.78x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 316°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources6 documents: EOS GmbH, Cleveland-Cliffs, Steel Construction Institute
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 217-4 PH Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsStainless Steel 17-4PH · Yield strength: typical, transverse, sheet/stripStainless Steel 17-4PH · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, transverse, sheet/stripStainless Steel 17-4PH · Elongation at break: typical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Young's modulus (stiffness): H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Density: H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Poisson's ratio: H 900 (column)Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Thermal conductivity: at 149 °C (300 °F), H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Thermal expansion: mean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Specific heat: mean, 0–100 °C, H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Max service temperature: strength-retention limit (not oxidation)
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 5Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 6316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (2.41x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is lighter: 7,800 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 185 GPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel, so the same part in Stainless Steel 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless Steel 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 8% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.44x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.82x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.57x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 9% for Stainless Steel 17-4PH.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium