Materials / Compare
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
Compare DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 1,100MPa1 | 1,275MPa216% stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,270MPa1 | 1,379MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | 8.7%1 | 9%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | same maker and process110GPa3 | H 900197GPa21.79x stiffer |
| Density | 4,400kg/m³11.77x lighter | H 9007,800kg/m³2 |
| Strength to weight | 250kN·m/kg1.53x higher | 163kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg1% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | wrought TIMETAL 6-40.3424 | H 9000.2722 |
| Shear modulus | 41GPa | 77.4GPa1.89x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 116GPa | 144GPa24% higher |
| Speed of sound | 5,000m/s | 5,026m/s |
| Thermal | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material6.6W/m·K5 | at 149 °C17.9W/m·K22.71x more heat through a fin |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C9µm/m·K620% less | mean10.8µm/m·K2 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 45µm growth20% less | 54µm growth |
| Specific heat | base material580J/kg·K526% higher | mean460J/kg·K2 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 2.59mm²/s | 4.99mm²/s1.93x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 4,825W/m | 7,809W/m1.62x more resistant |
| Melting point | melting range1,630–1,650°C4 | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 316°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources6 documents: EOS GmbH, Cleveland-Cliffs, TIMET
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)
- 1EOS Titanium Ti64ELI Material Data Sheet, M 290 and M 400EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Yield strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Elongation at break: typical at break, as built (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Density: typical part density (ISO 3369), M400
- 217-4 PH Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsStainless Steel 17-4PH · Yield strength: typical, transverse, sheet/stripStainless Steel 17-4PH · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, transverse, sheet/stripStainless Steel 17-4PH · Elongation at break: typical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Young's modulus (stiffness): H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Density: H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Poisson's ratio: H 900 (column)Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Thermal conductivity: at 149 °C (300 °F), H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Thermal expansion: mean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Specific heat: mean, 0–100 °C, H 900Stainless Steel 17-4PH · Max service temperature: strength-retention limit (not oxidation)
- 3EOS Titanium Ti64 Material Data Sheet, M 290 (2022)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Young's modulus (stiffness): same maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical
- 4TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Poisson's ratio: wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measuredDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Melting point: melting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level)
- 5TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °CDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Specific heat: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C
- 6EOS Titanium Ti64 Grade 23 Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium stronger than Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 1,100 MPa for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium (16%).
Which is lighter, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter: 4,400 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 17-4PH.
Which is stiffer, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 110 GPa for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium, so the same part in Stainless Steel 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless Steel 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).
| Part that must be | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 1% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 46% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 1.61x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.65x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 10.8 µm/m·K for Stainless Steel 17-4PH.
Related comparisons
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Titanium