Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa1 | 1,100MPa22.08x stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa1 | 1,270MPa21.98x stronger |
| Elongation at break | 40%14.6x more ductile | 8.7%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa31.68x stiffer | same maker and process110GPa4 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³5 | 4,400kg/m³21.8x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 250kN·m/kg3.73x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25MN·m/kg7% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.36 | wrought TIMETAL 6-40.3427 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa1.74x stiffer in shear | 41GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa33% higher | 116GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,000m/s3% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K82.45x more heat through a fin | base material6.6W/m·K9 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K1 | mean 25-100 °C9µm/m·K101.75x less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 45µm growth1.75x less |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K8 | base material580J/kg·K916% higher |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s1.59x faster | 2.59mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 4,825W/m2.33x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | melting range1,630–1,650°C7 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources10 documents: EOS GmbH, Steel Construction Institute, TIMET, Cleveland-Cliffs
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 2EOS Titanium Ti64ELI Material Data Sheet, M 290 and M 400EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Yield strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Elongation at break: typical at break, as built (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Density: typical part density (ISO 3369), M400
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4EOS Titanium Ti64 Material Data Sheet, M 290 (2022)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Young's modulus (stiffness): same maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical
- 5EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 6Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 7TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Poisson's ratio: wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measuredDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Melting point: melting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level)
- 8316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
- 9TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °CDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Specific heat: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C
- 10EOS Titanium Ti64 Grade 23 Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (2.08x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter: 4,400 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 110 GPa for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 7% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 38% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.73x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.92x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.59x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 8.7% for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340