Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Sources4 documents: ATI, Nathan Trotter, Steel Construction Institute, Eastern Alloys
Stainless Steel 316
ATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual
Zinc Zamak 3
Zamak 3 (ASTM B86 die cast), Nathan Trotter (zinc alloy producer) technical data sheet, typical values
1
ATI 316, 316L, 317 and 317L Technical Data Sheet (2012)ATIarchived copyStainless Steel 316 · Yield strength: typical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheetStainless Steel 316 · Ultimate tensile strength: typical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheetStainless Steel 316 · Elongation at break: typical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)Stainless Steel 316 · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, in tensionStainless Steel 316 · Density: typicalStainless Steel 316 · Thermal conductivity: 20–100 °CStainless Steel 316 · Thermal expansion: mean, 20–100 °CStainless Steel 316 · Specific heat: at 20 °CStainless Steel 316 · Melting point: melting rangeStainless Steel 316 · Max service temperature: oxidation (scaling) limit in air
Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyStainless Steel 316 · Poisson's ratio: design value (structural stainless steels)
4
Zinc Die Casting Properties Guide (2012)Eastern AlloysZinc Zamak 3 · Poisson's ratio: typical, Zamak 3 hot-chamber die cast
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Mechanical
Is Stainless Steel 316 stronger than Zinc Zamak 3?
Stainless Steel 316 is stronger: its yield strength is 265 MPa against 221 MPa for Zinc Zamak 3 (20%).
Which is lighter, Stainless Steel 316 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Zinc Zamak 3 is lighter: 6,600 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 316.
Which is stiffer, Stainless Steel 316 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Stainless Steel 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 85.5 GPa for Zinc Zamak 3, so the same part in Stainless Steel 316 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless Steel 316 or Zinc Zamak 3?
For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless Steel 316 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Zinc Zamak 3 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
Part that must be
Stainless Steel 316
Zinc Zamak 3
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
lighter
1.92x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)
lighter
26% heavier
Stiff panel or plate
lighter
9% heavier
Strong rod or tie
1% heavier
lighter
Strong beam
8% heavier
lighter
Strong panel or plate
11% heavier
lighter
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, Stainless Steel 316 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Stainless Steel 316 stretches further before it breaks: 61% elongation at break against 10% for Zinc Zamak 3.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, Stainless Steel 316 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Zinc Zamak 3 conducts heat better: 113 W/m·K against 14.6 W/m·K for Stainless Steel 316.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless Steel 316 expands less: 16.5 µm/m·K against 27.4 µm/m·K for Zinc Zamak 3.