Materials / Compare

Plastic PETG vs. Plastic PLA

Compare Plastic PETG vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Plastic PETG3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
MechanicalPlastic PETGPlastic PLA
Yield strength46.2MPa152.5MPa214% stronger
Ultimate tensile strength46.2MPa152.5MPa214% stronger
Flexural strength78.9MPa196.8MPa223% stronger in bending
Elongation at break7.6%17.8%2
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.94GPa13.25GPa21.68x stiffer
Density1,270kg/m³11,240kg/m³2
Strength to weight36.4kN·m/kg42.3kN·m/kg16% higher
Stiffness to weight1.53MN·m/kg2.62MN·m/kg1.72x higher
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,236m/s1,619m/s31% faster
1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonWoodAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Copper C10100Copper C12200GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin StandardSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelConcretePCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum 3003-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PETGPlastic PLA
Stiffness against densityHigher and further left: stiffer for its weight
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberWoodAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Copper C10100Copper C12200GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin StandardSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum 3003-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PETGPlastic PLA
Strength against densityHigher and further left: stronger for its weight
ThermalPlastic PETGPlastic PLA
Thermal conductivitybase material0.21W/m·K31.62x more heat through a finbase material0.13W/m·K4
Thermal expansionbase material51µm/m·K3not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing255µm growthnot sourced
Specific heatbase material1,300J/kg·K3base material1,200J/kg·K4
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.127mm²/s46% faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced152°C2
Glass transition77.4°C118.3 °C higher59.1°C2
Max service temperatureHDT 0.455 MPa76.2°C117.4 °C hotterHDT 0.455 MPa58.8°C2
1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Thermal conductivity (W/m·K)Plastic ABSPlastic NylonRubberWoodAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Copper C10100Copper C12200GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin StandardDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelConcreteBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum 3003-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PETGPlastic PLA
Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weight
0.111010010100Thermal conductivity (W/m·K)Thermal expansion (µm/m·K)Plastic ABSPlastic NylonWoodAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Copper C10100Copper C12200GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin StandardDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelConcreteBrickPlywoodPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum 3003-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PETG
Thermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Sources4 documents: UltiMaker, Eastman, NatureWorks
Plastic PETG
Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022.
Plastic PLA
Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.
  1. 1
    Ultimaker PETG Technical Data Sheet, v1.00UltiMakerarchived copyPlastic PETG · Yield strength: typicalPlastic PETG · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, peak stress (= stress at yield)Plastic PETG · Flexural strength: typicalPlastic PETG · Elongation at break: typicalPlastic PETG · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalPlastic PETG · Density: typicalPlastic PETG · Glass transition: typicalPlastic PETG · Max service temperature: HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
  2. 2
    Ultimaker PLA Technical Data Sheet, v5.00UltiMakerarchived copyPlastic PLA · Yield strength: typicalPlastic PLA · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, peak stress (= stress at yield)Plastic PLA · Flexural strength: typicalPlastic PLA · Elongation at break: typicalPlastic PLA · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalPlastic PLA · Density: typicalPlastic PLA · Melting point: typicalPlastic PLA · Glass transition: typicalPlastic PLA · Max service temperature: HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
  3. 3
    Eastar Copolyester 6763 Product Data SheetEastmanPlastic PETG · Thermal conductivity: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typicalPlastic PETG · Thermal expansion: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typicalPlastic PETG · Specific heat: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed)
  4. 4
    Engineering Properties of Ingeo BiopolymerNatureWorksarchived copyPlastic PLA · Thermal conductivity: base material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °CPlastic PLA · Specific heat: base material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C

Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PETG and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Mechanical

Is Plastic PETG stronger than Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (14%).

Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 1,270 kg/m³ for Plastic PETG.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PETGPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)1.72x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)33% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate22% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie16% heavierlighter
Strong beam12% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate9% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Thermal

Which handles higher temperatures, Plastic PETG or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PETG does: 76.2 °C against 58.8 °C for Plastic PLA, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PETG conducts heat better: 0.21 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Related comparisons