Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 53.3MPa115% stronger | 46.2MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPa115% stronger | 46.2MPa2 |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPa113% stronger in bending | 78.9MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%121% more ductile | 7.6%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPa123% stiffer | 1.94GPa2 |
| Density | range1,180–1,200kg/m³1 | 1,270kg/m³2 |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg23% higher | 36.4kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg32% higher | 1.53MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.383 | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s15% faster | 1,236m/s |
| Thermal | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material0.2W/m·K4 | base material0.21W/m·K5 |
| Thermal expansion | base material65µm/m·K4 | base material51µm/m·K527% less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 255µm growth27% less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | base material1,300J/kg·K5 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.127mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 108°C130.3 °C higher | 77.4°C2 |
| Max service temperature | HDT 0.455 MPa105°C128.3 °C hotter | HDT 0.455 MPa76.2°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources5 documents: UltiMaker, Covestro, Eastman
- FDM Polycarbonate
- Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.
- Plastic PETG
- Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022.
- 1Ultimaker PC Technical Data Sheet, v5.00UltiMakerarchived copyFDM Polycarbonate · Yield strength: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, peak stress (= stress at yield)FDM Polycarbonate · Flexural strength: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Elongation at break: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Density: rangeFDM Polycarbonate · Glass transition: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Max service temperature: HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
- 2Ultimaker PETG Technical Data Sheet, v1.00UltiMakerarchived copyPlastic PETG · Yield strength: typicalPlastic PETG · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, peak stress (= stress at yield)Plastic PETG · Flexural strength: typicalPlastic PETG · Elongation at break: typicalPlastic PETG · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalPlastic PETG · Density: typicalPlastic PETG · Glass transition: typicalPlastic PETG · Max service temperature: HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
- 3Engineering Polymers Part and Mold Design: Thermoplastics, A Design GuideCovestroarchived copyFDM Polycarbonate · Poisson's ratio: base material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
- 4Makrolon 2405 Technical Data SheetCovestroFDM Polycarbonate · Thermal conductivity: base material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °CFDM Polycarbonate · Thermal expansion: base material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel
- 5Eastar Copolyester 6763 Product Data SheetEastmanPlastic PETG · Thermal conductivity: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typicalPlastic PETG · Thermal expansion: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typicalPlastic PETG · Specific heat: base material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate and Plastic PETG are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 53.3 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (15%).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,270 kg/m³ for Plastic PETG.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 19% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 14% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 23% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 17% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 15% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 7.6% for Plastic PETG.
Thermal
Which handles higher temperatures, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate does: 105 °C against 76.2 °C for Plastic PETG, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
Plastic PETG conducts heat better: 0.21 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PETG expands less: 51 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic PETG vs. SLS PA12 Nylon