Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 53.3MPa11.62x stronger | 33MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPa1 | not stated (yield given) |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPa1 | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%1 | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPa11.65x stiffer | 1.45GPa2 |
| Density | range1,180–1,200kg/m³1 | 900kg/m³2 |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg22% higher | 36.7kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg25% higher | 1.61MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.383 | base material0.424 |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa1.7x stiffer in shear | 0.511GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa10% higher | 3.02GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s12% faster | 1,269m/s |
| Thermal | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material0.2W/m·K5 | base material0.17–0.22W/m·K4 |
| Thermal expansion | base material65µm/m·K5 | base material80–100µm/m·K4 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth38% less | 450µm growth |
| Specific heat | not sourced | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m49% more resistant | 28.6W/m |
| Glass transition | 108°C1 | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | HDT 0.455 MPa105°C1 | HDT 0.45 MPa90°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources5 documents: UltiMaker, LyondellBasell, Covestro, INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA
- FDM Polycarbonate
- Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.
- Plastic Polypropylene
- LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values
- 1Ultimaker PC Technical Data Sheet, v5.00UltiMakerarchived copyFDM Polycarbonate · Yield strength: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, peak stress (= stress at yield)FDM Polycarbonate · Flexural strength: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Elongation at break: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Density: rangeFDM Polycarbonate · Glass transition: typicalFDM Polycarbonate · Max service temperature: HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
- 2Moplen HP501H Product DataLyondellBasellPlastic Polypropylene · Yield strength: typical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527Plastic Polypropylene · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, tensile modulus ISO 527Plastic Polypropylene · Density: typical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1Plastic Polypropylene · Max service temperature: HDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
- 3Engineering Polymers Part and Mold Design: Thermoplastics, A Design GuideCovestroarchived copyFDM Polycarbonate · Poisson's ratio: base material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
- 4Typical Engineering Properties of PolypropyleneINEOS Olefins & Polymers USAarchived copyPlastic Polypropylene · Poisson's ratio: base material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)Plastic Polypropylene · Thermal conductivity: base material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)Plastic Polypropylene · Thermal expansion: base material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
- 5Makrolon 2405 Technical Data SheetCovestroFDM Polycarbonate · Thermal conductivity: base material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °CFDM Polycarbonate · Thermal expansion: base material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?
FDM Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 53.3 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (1.62x).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?
FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 25% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 12% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 22% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 4% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?
FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber