Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Titanium
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa1 | 885MPa21.67x stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa1 | 940MPa247% stronger |
| Elongation at break | 40%12.5x more ductile | 16%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa3 | 107–122GPa4 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³5 | 4,430kg/m³21.78x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg2.98x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg10% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.36 | 0.3422 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa1.67x stiffer in shear | 42.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa28% higher | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,084m/s5% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K72.45x more heat through a fin | 6.6W/m·K4 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K1 | 9µm/m·K41.75x less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 45µm growth1.75x less |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K7 | 580J/kg·K416% higher |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s1.6x faster | 2.57mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 3,730W/m1.8x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | melting range1,630–1,650°C2 |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 400°C2 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources7 documents: EOS GmbH, TIMET, Steel Construction Institute, Cleveland-Cliffs
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- Titanium
- TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 2TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyTitanium · Yield strength: typical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offsetTitanium · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, plate, annealedTitanium · Elongation at break: typical, in 2 in., plate annealedTitanium · Density: nominalTitanium · Poisson's ratio: mean of TIMET measurementsTitanium · Melting point: melting rangeTitanium · Max service temperature: upper recommended use temperature
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyTitanium · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical range, 20 °CTitanium · Thermal conductivity: typical, 20 °C, mill annealedTitanium · Thermal expansion: typical, mean 0-100 °CTitanium · Specific heat: typical, 20 °C
- 5EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 6Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 7316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Titanium?
Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (1.67x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium?
Titanium is lighter: 4,430 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 115 GPa for Titanium, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium?
For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 10% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 40% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.52x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.98x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.3x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 16% for Titanium.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Titanium?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- Titanium vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340