Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | 530MPa11.96x stronger | 270MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPa142% stronger | 450MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | 40%13.92x more ductile | 10.2%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPa32.57x stiffer | 72GPa4 |
| Density | part density7,900kg/m³5 | 2,670kg/m³62.96x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 101kN·m/kg1.51x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 27MN·m/kg15% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.37 | base material0.338 |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa2.63x stiffer in shear | 27.1GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa2.18x higher | 70.6GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,193m/s7% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material16.2W/m·K9 | 110W/m·K26.79x more heat through a fin |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C15.7µm/m·K127% less | mean 25-100 °C20µm/m·K2 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth27% less | 100µm growth |
| Specific heat | base material500J/kg·K9 | base material963J/kg·K8 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 42.8mm²/s10.4x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 13,819W/m6.69x more resistant |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources9 documents: EOS GmbH, Renishaw, Steel Construction Institute, U.S. Department of Defense, Cleveland-Cliffs
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
- EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 2EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Thermal conductivity: typical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 3EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, M 280 and M 290 (2014)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
- 4RenAM 500 Series Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data SheetRenishawDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Young's modulus (stiffness): same material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)
- 5EOS StainlessSteel 316L Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2016)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Density: part density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
- 6EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2018)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Density: typical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)
- 7Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, 4th Edition (P413)Steel Construction Institutearchived copyDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
- 8MIL-HDBK-5J, Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures (2003)U.S. Department of DefenseDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Poisson's ratio: base material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Specific heat: base material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C
- 9316/316L Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °CDMLS 316L Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (1.96x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 15% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.85x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.16x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.89x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.11x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 10.2% for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6063-T6