Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.
Plastic PEEK
Victrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)
1
VICTREX PEEK 450G Technical Data SheetVictrexPlastic PEEK · Yield strength: typical, tensile yieldPlastic PEEK · Compressive strength: typical, 23 CPlastic PEEK · Flexural strength: typical, flexural stress at yield, 23 CPlastic PEEK · Elongation at break: typical, at breakPlastic PEEK · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical (nominal)Plastic PEEK · Density: typical (crystalline)Plastic PEEK · Thermal conductivity: typical, average, 23 CPlastic PEEK · Thermal expansion: average of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)Plastic PEEK · Melting point: typical, DSCPlastic PEEK · Glass transition: onset (midpoint 150 C)Plastic PEEK · Max service temperature: UL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)
VICTREX PEEK for Use in Fluid Management (2020)VictrexPlastic PEEK · Poisson's ratio: typical
4
VICTREX PEEK 450G Technical Data Sheet (2012)Victrexarchived copyPlastic PEEK · Specific heat: typical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is FDM PAHT-CF stronger than Plastic PEEK?
Plastic PEEK is stronger: its yield strength is 98 MPa against tensile strength 92 MPa for FDM PAHT-CF (7%).
Which is lighter, FDM PAHT-CF or Plastic PEEK?
FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 1,300 kg/m³ for Plastic PEEK.
Which is stiffer, FDM PAHT-CF or Plastic PEEK?
Plastic PEEK is stiffer: Young's modulus 4 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Plastic PEEK deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM PAHT-CF or Plastic PEEK?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
Part that must be
FDM PAHT-CF
Plastic PEEK
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
lighter
18% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)
lighter
20% heavier
Stiff panel or plate
lighter
21% heavier
Strong rod or tie
lighter
15% heavier
Strong beam
lighter
18% heavier
Strong panel or plate
lighter
19% heavier
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM PAHT-CF or Plastic PEEK?
Plastic PEEK stretches further before it breaks: 25% elongation at break against 8.4% for FDM PAHT-CF.