Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Bambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.
SLA Resin Tough 2000
Formlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.
Luran S 777K (ASA) Product Data SheetINEOS StyrolutionFDM ASA · Thermal conductivity: base material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typicalFDM ASA · Thermal expansion: base material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM ASA and SLA Resin Tough 2000 are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is FDM ASA stronger than SLA Resin Tough 2000?
SLA Resin Tough 2000 is stronger: its yield strength is 40.4 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (9%).
Which is lighter, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,090 kg/m³ for SLA Resin Tough 2000.
Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
FDM ASA is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.45 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in FDM ASA deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam.
Part that must be
FDM ASA
SLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
lighter
41% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)
lighter
21% heavier
Stiff panel or plate
lighter
15% heavier
Strong rod or tie
5% heavier
lighter
Strong beam
2% heavier
lighter
Strong panel or plate
about equal
about equal
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
SLA Resin Tough 2000 stretches further before it breaks: 79% elongation at break against 9.2% for FDM ASA.
Thermal
Which handles higher temperatures, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
FDM ASA does: 92 °C against 57 °C for SLA Resin Tough 2000, both HDT 1.8 MPa.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM ASA expands less: 95 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.