Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | mean861MPa1 | 1,100MPa228% stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | mean886MPa1 | 1,270MPa243% stronger |
| Elongation at break | mean at break19.9%12.29x more ductile | 8.7%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | base material197GPa31.79x stiffer | same maker and process110GPa4 |
| Density | mean part density7,790kg/m³1 | 4,400kg/m³21.77x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg | 250kN·m/kg2.26x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg1% higher | 25MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.2723 | wrought TIMETAL 6-40.3425 |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa1.89x stiffer in shear | 41GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa24% higher | 116GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 5,000m/s |
| Thermal | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material17.9W/m·K32.71x more heat through a fin | base material6.6W/m·K6 |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C10.4µm/m·K1 | mean 25-100 °C9µm/m·K716% less |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth | 45µm growth16% less |
| Specific heat | base material460J/kg·K3 | base material580J/kg·K626% higher |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s1.93x faster | 2.59mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m13% more resistant | 4,825W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | melting range1,630–1,650°C5 |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources7 documents: EOS GmbH, Cleveland-Cliffs, TIMET
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine Material Data Sheet, M 290EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Yield strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: mean at break, as built, horizontalDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Density: mean part density (ISO 3369)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)
- 2EOS Titanium Ti64ELI Material Data Sheet, M 290 and M 400EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Yield strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Elongation at break: typical at break, as built (M400)DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Density: typical part density (ISO 3369), M400
- 317-4 PH Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
- 4EOS Titanium Ti64 Material Data Sheet, M 290 (2022)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Young's modulus (stiffness): same maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical
- 5TIMETAL 6-4 PropertiesTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Poisson's ratio: wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measuredDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Melting point: melting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level)
- 6TIMETAL 6-4 Data SheetTIMETarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °CDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Specific heat: base material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C
- 7EOS Titanium Ti64 Grade 23 Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel and DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (28%).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter: 4,400 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 110 GPa for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 1% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 32% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 46% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.26x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.09x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 19.9% elongation at break against 8.7% for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 10.4 µm/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340