Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Ceramic Seal Material Properties (01899 F)CoorsTekarchived copyCeramic Alumina 96% · Ultimate tensile strength: typical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Compressive strength: typical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Flexural strength: flexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Young's modulus (stiffness): typical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Density: typical (ASTM-C20)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Poisson's ratio: typical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Thermal conductivity: typical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Thermal expansion: mean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372)Ceramic Alumina 96% · Specific heat: typical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269)
3
MIL-HDBK-5J, Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures (2003)U.S. Department of DefenseSteel AISI 1018 · Young's modulus (stiffness): base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Density: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Poisson's ratio: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Thermal conductivity: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)Steel AISI 1018 · Specific heat: base material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
4
S275JR Steel GradeOvakoSteel AISI 1018 · Thermal expansion: base material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Mechanical
Is Ceramic Alumina 96% stronger than Steel AISI 1018?
Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against tensile strength 221 MPa for Ceramic Alumina 96% (1.68x).
Which is lighter, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Steel AISI 1018?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter: 3,720 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.
Which is stiffer, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Steel AISI 1018?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel AISI 1018, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Steel AISI 1018?
For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
Part that must be
Ceramic Alumina 96%
Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
lighter
3.2x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)
lighter
2.6x heavier
Stiff panel or plate
lighter
2.43x heavier
Strong rod or tie
lighter
26% heavier
Strong beam
lighter
49% heavier
Strong panel or plate
lighter
1.63x heavier
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Steel AISI 1018?
Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 24.7 W/m·K for Ceramic Alumina 96%.
Which expands less with temperature?
Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 12 µm/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.