Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Mechanical | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | mean861MPa13.19x stronger | 270MPa2 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | mean886MPa11.97x stronger | 450MPa2 |
| Elongation at break | mean at break19.9%11.95x more ductile | 10.2%2 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | base material197GPa32.74x stiffer | 72GPa4 |
| Density | mean part density7,790kg/m³1 | 2,670kg/m³52.92x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg9% higher | 101kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg | 27MN·m/kg7% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | base material0.2723 | base material0.336 |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa2.86x stiffer in shear | 27.1GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa2.04x higher | 70.6GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 5,193m/s3% faster |
| Thermal | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity | base material17.9W/m·K3 | 110W/m·K26.15x more heat through a fin |
| Thermal expansion | mean 25-100 °C10.4µm/m·K11.92x less | mean 25-100 °C20µm/m·K2 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth1.92x less | 100µm growth |
| Specific heat | base material460J/kg·K3 | base material963J/kg·K6 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s | 42.8mm²/s8.56x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m | 13,819W/m2.52x more resistant |
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|
Sources6 documents: EOS GmbH, Cleveland-Cliffs, Renishaw, U.S. Department of Defense
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
- EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10
- 1EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine Material Data Sheet, M 290EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Yield strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Ultimate tensile strength: mean, as built, horizontal (N=72)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Elongation at break: mean at break, as built, horizontalDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Density: mean part density (ISO 3369)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)
- 2EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data SheetEOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Yield strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Elongation at break: typical at break, as manufactured, horizontalDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Thermal conductivity: typical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Thermal expansion: mean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
- 317-4 PH Stainless Steel Product Data Bulletin (2021)Cleveland-CliffsDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Young's modulus (stiffness): base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Poisson's ratio: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Thermal conductivity: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel · Specific heat: base material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
- 4RenAM 500 Series Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data SheetRenishawDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Young's modulus (stiffness): same material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)
- 5EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg Material Data Sheet, FlexLine, M 290 (2018)EOS GmbHarchived copyDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Density: typical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)
- 6MIL-HDBK-5J, Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures (2003)U.S. Department of DefenseDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Poisson's ratio: base material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum · Specific heat: base material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel and DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (3.19x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie; DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 7% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.76x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.09x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 9% heavier |
| Strong beam | 35% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.63x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 19.9% elongation at break against 10.2% for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6063-T6